Helping Hands Newsletter: Healthy Workplace Relationships

Helping Hands Newsletter: Healthy Workplace Relationships

EAP Peers;

As many communities and states start to ease the restrictions everyone has been under, there will be concerns about returning to the workplace. For most of us, we have been at work as essential workers. Returning to the workplace isn’t an issue because we have continued to be in the workplace. There are many physical issues that have been and will be addressed. Of concern also are the relationships in the workplace. Each of us brings our own set of concerns about what our workplace will look like going forward. This issue focuses on workplace relationships. 

There are ideas about how to foster positive relationships in the workplace. Additionally, responding to co-workers when they are anxious, depressed or showing any signs of not coping are addressed.

The EAP peer network is an important part of the corona virus recovery. Thank you for continuing to be a part of this network! I am grateful for each one of you and all of the support you are giving to everyone around you. We will get through this!

Bryan,
Bryan Hutchinson, M.S.

Helping Hands Special Edition

The Employee Assistance Program is a compassionate, confidential, and free service that has helped hundreds of people cope with personal crises.

    Previous 

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Letter from Rep. Joseph Kennedy to United CEO

Letter from Rep. Joseph Kennedy to United CEO

May 12, 2020

Mr. Oscar Munoz
Chief Executive Officer, United Airlines, Inc.
PO Box 06649
Chicago, IL 60606-0649

Dear Mr. Munoz,

I am alarmed by United Airlines’ decision to eliminate 3,400 management and administration positions on October 1, 2020 and reduce approximately 15,000 full-time positions to part-time on May 24, 2020. These actions are not only devastating to the employees who will lose all or some of their income, but also violate the congressional intent behind the Payroll Support Program.

On April 15, 2020, United Airlines accepted $5 billion in taxpayer assistance via the Payroll Support Program, $3.5 billion of which will not need to be paid back. By accepting these funds, United Airlines committed to not reduce employee pay or benefits, or implement involuntary furloughs through September 30, 2020; to limit executive compensation and prohibit stock buybacks or dividends through September 30, 2021; and to protect collective bargaining agreements through September 30, 2020. This program was created to give airlines time and flexibility to adapt to changing economic conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and find ways to minimize layoffs.

I am concerned several recent decisions made by United Airlines potentially violate the requirements of the Payroll Support Program, and certainly violate the spirit of the law. United Airlines announced a planned 30 percent reduction of management and administration positions five months before the reduction can legally occur. While not illegal, the early announcement indicates that United Airlines is not using the time and flexibility provided by the Payroll Support Program to save jobs.

On March 27, 2020 you promised your employees that United Airlines would “not conduct involuntary furloughs or pay cuts in the U.S. before September 30, 2020.” Unfortunately, this commitment appears to have been misleading. United Airlines sent memos to over 11,000 employees, which included instructions requiring employees to take 20 unpaid days off before they are fired, and implementing mandatory hour reductions. Both practices reduce employee pay without consent, undermining your promise that taking care of employees will remain your number one priority.

Further, United Airlines announced on May 1, 2020 that 15,000 workers, including baggage handlers, customer service agents, and reservations agents, would transition to part-time work at the end of May. These employees were given 13 days to decide if they would accept their planned reduction to part time status, voluntarily leave their job without recall rights, retire with no recall rights, or choose to furlough with furlough pay and a right of recall. Not only does this supposed request reduce employee pay, in a potential violation of the Payroll Support Program, it presents employees with an impossible choice: struggle to pay the bills while taking home a smaller paycheck or try to collect unemployment and find a job in one of the worst labor markets in history. This choice is made even more difficult by the fact that most states consider unemployment applications from individuals who voluntarily left their jobs on a case-by-case basis, meaning the applications are more likely to be denied and take longer to process.

While I am glad that public outcry and pending legal action pushed United Airlines to make these mandatory hour reductions voluntary, I remain deeply concerned by your labor practices. I am particularly troubled by the statement that the originally proposed mandatory hour reductions will be implemented by late June if an insufficient number of employees volunteer to reduce their hours. The very act of threatening across-the-board schedule reductions makes the current ‘voluntary’ reductions anything but voluntary.

United Airlines Spokesman Frank Benenati was correct when he stated that it is not sustainable for the company to spend billions more than it takes in. However, it is also correct to state that a business model that spends 80 percent of free cash flow on stock buybacks, just as United Airlines has done for the last decade, is unsustainable. For years, the business prioritized increasing stock values for shareholders and top executives over saving and preparing for the next economic downturn. United Airlines would be less reliant on government assistance and would not have to push workers off the payrolls if company leadership focused on long-term sustainability instead of enriching themselves.

I urge United Airlines to honor the commitments you made to your employees and the American people by ending your efforts to cut employee hours and calling off the upcoming layoffs. We can only weather this crisis if all parties work together and act in good faith.

I look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Joseph P Kennedy, III
Member of Congress

Please print and post on all IAMAW Bulletin Boards.

Contact Rep. Kennedy

Representative Joseph Kennedy and other elected leaders need to know that we appreciate their help. (Massachusetts Residents)

Airlines Ask the TSA for Temperature Checks.

Airlines Ask the TSA for Temperature Checks.

Airlines need passengers to feel safe. Businesses need to provide excellent customer service to prosper. Temperature checks help achieve these goals.

In order to ramp up to recover from the biggest crisis they have faced in decades, airlines need to convince passengers that their aircraft are clean, not overcrowded, and not vehicles for pandemic spread. They also need to start adopting policies that passengers like, even if shareholders don’t.

One idea making the rounds: temperature checks for passengers at the airport.

Airlines are asking the Transportation Security Administration to screen passengers for fever as they pass through airport security checkpoints. A lobbying group representing the largest carriers in the US, including American and United, issued a statement last week urging the federal agency to adopt the policy.

According to the statement, Airlines for America said temperature screenings,  “will add an extra layer of protection for passengers as well as airline and airport employees. Temperature checks also will provide additional public confidence that is critical to relaunching air travel and our nation’s economy.”

In other words, promoting passenger safety is a good public relations policy. 

Read the full AFA statement here.

The TSA has not begun screening passengers, and there are no plans to do so, even on a trial basis. However, now that AFA has endorsed the idea, expect Congress to take the matter seriously.

In addition to the possibility of future temperature checks, many airlines are now using special cleaning methods and are requiring passengers to wear face masks

Airlines have a lot of work to do as they try to win back passenger traffic, and there are some indications they are learning from past mistakes. Years of cramming more and more seats into aircraft, byzantine rules for loyalty programs, and charging extra for things like checked bags and wi-fi have taken a toll. According to a recent Harris Survey published by Travel Weekly, only 19% of Americans say they have a better opinion of airlines now than they did a few months ago. Policies that victimize passengers when they try to cancel a flight and attempts to take taxpayer-funded payroll assistance…and then turn around and furlough employees instead… aren’t helping.

Airlines must accomplish two key things to regain passenger confidence. First, they need to reassure the public that it’s safe to fly. Harris polls show this will not be easy; only 42% of Americans say they would fly within 6 months of the end of the pandemic. Second, airlines must convince passengers that there is a commitment to customer service, something airline executives seem to be struggling with as they try to keep costs low. 


The first challenge is making sure that airline passengers feel safe. Will temperature screening accomplish that? Will it make a real difference, or would it just be a public relations ploy? Are good public relations such a bad thing for the airlines right now?

We want to know what you think. Do you support temperature screenings at TSA Security Checkpoints? Take our quick survey and let us know what you think in the comments section.

 

What do you think?

    RELATED ARTICLES

Discussing United Lawsuit, Labor Issues with the Valley Labor Report

Discussing United Lawsuit, Labor Issues with the Valley Labor Report

Mike Klemm, President and Directing General Chair of District 141 of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, sits down with the Valley Labor Report to discuss labor issues in the airline industry. 

Hosts David Story and Jacob Morrison asked Klemm to talk about how the union defeated an attempt by United Airlines executives to furlough and impose pay cuts and benefit reductions for 15,000 workers. 

International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers’ District 141 President Mike Klemm told VLR show hosts David Story and Jacob Morrison that protecting jobs from mass elimination was something that could only be done through mass action; individual workers would always be outspent by their corporations. 

The Valley Labor Report is a weekly radio program airing Saturday mornings on 92.5 WVNN based in Athens, Alabama.  Listeners can tune in live at WVNN.com and on YouTube.

The full broadcast with IAMAW District 141 President Mike Klemm is available here.

Machinists Union Withdraws United Lawsuit After Airline Drops Illegal Furlough Plan

Machinists Union Withdraws United Lawsuit After Airline Drops Illegal Furlough Plan

The Machinists Union today withdrew its lawsuit against United Airlines after the carrier backed down from its plans to cut the pay rates of its entire full-time Fleet Service and Customer Service workgroups by reducing their hours worked.

The IAM maintains the right to return to Federal Court if United Airlines again attempts to circumvent the CARES Act or the IAM’s collective bargaining agreements.

Fraternally and in Solidarity,

Michael G. Klemm
President and Directing General Chairman
IAMAW, District Lodge 141

Please print and post on all IAMAW bulletin boards.

Get printable copy > 

Hawaiian Airlines Negotiations Update

Hawaiian Airlines Negotiations Update

 May 8, 2020

Dear Sisters and Brothers,

We hope this communication finds you safe and healthy. As you are aware, we entered into Limited Issue/Expedited Negotiations with Hawaiian Airlines in the month of February. The majority of the Negotiating sessions were spent on sharing the proposals of both sides. We spent time explaining your proposals and listening to the Company proposals so that we had a very good understanding of the intention/purpose of the Company proposals. We were able to make some progress and felt that we were on our way to reaching a good Agreement on your behalf. The plan was to meet most of the month of April in hopes of reaching that Agreement. Unfortunately, due to the COVID 19 pandemic, we were not able to meet to further the discussions.

On Monday, May 4, We held a conference call with the Company to discuss resuming Negotiations. We made it very clear that our position remains unchanged. We must reach an agreement that rewards our Members at HA fairly for their hard work and sacrifices. We believe that HA will survive the current state of the Airline Industry and will return to profitability. Today’s hard work and sacrifice will make that possible. You deserve to be recognized for that moving in to the future. That recognition comes from a good Contract. An agreement was made to extend the timeframe for the Expedited Negotiations.

The plan for Negotiations will be to resume meeting with the Company as soon as the quarantine order is lifted by the State of Hawaii. We hope that happens sometime in June. Our position will be to pick up where we left off in March.

In closing, thank you for all you do. It is with your support and solidarity that your Negotiating Committee will be able to secure a good contract on your behalf.

In solidarity, 

Mike Klemm

President and Directing General Chair, District 141, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers

Dave Supplee

President and Directing General Chair, District 142, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers

Please print and post on all IAMAW bulletin boards.