The Battle for a First Contract: How Employers Use Unfair Labor Practices

The Battle for a First Contract: How Employers Use Unfair Labor Practices

The Battle for a First Contract: How Employers Use Unfair Labor Practices

IAM141.org

Recent victories in organizing workers at companies such as Amazon, Starbucks, and Trader Joe’s indicate that it is possible for workers in industries previously thought to be impossible to unify. 

However, even when unions are formed, they often do not reach legally binding agreements with employers that would give workers more control over their pay, benefits, and protections. 

New research from the ILR School at Cornell University shows that when employers commit unfair labor practices to impede contract negotiations, the chances of winning a first contract within 18 months of voting to form a union decrease by about 71%. 

The study, titled “Breaking the deadlock: How union and employer tactics affect first contract achievement,” was published in the Industrial Relations Journal on February 25 and co-authored by ILR Ph.D. students Johnnie Kallas and Dongwoo Park and the University of Windsor Assistant Professor Rachel Aleks. According to Kallas, many people assume that winning a union election means being able to negotiate a contract readily. Still, in reality, less than half of unions have an agreement one year after an election. This is because nothing in U.S. labor law requires an employer to reach an agreement on a first contract within a given timeframe. Unethical employers can prolong labor talks for years.

According to the National Labor Relations Board, the National Labor Relations Act gives employees the right to bargain collectively with their employer through a representative they and their coworkers choose. The union and employer must bargain in good faith about wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment until they agree on a labor contract or reach a stand-off or “impasse.” However, an employer is not legally required to reach an agreement on a first contract within the timeframe union members ask for.

The National Labor Relation Board is the Federal agency that regulates unions outside the transportation sector. Railroads and Airlines are regulated by another agency called the National Mediation Board.

Employer opposition can have a negative impact on unions achieving a first contract, with many engaging in illegal tactics such as spreading rumors about job loss and plant closings. Employers also use other unethical means, such as captive audience meetings, to delay the process. In 39% of cases, employers retained the use of an anti-union consultant.

According to a recent article from Bloomberg Law, the time it takes to negotiate a first contract with a union has increased from an average of 409 days to now an average of 465 days – or well over one year. A typical airline contract takes an average of 4 years to fully negotiate.

However, it is important to note that this is an average, and the actual time it takes to negotiate a first contract can vary depending on various factors such as the industry or sector in which the negotiations are occurring.

Unfortunately, some employers may choose to ignore labor laws altogether. This can result in HR policy blunders and expensive lawsuits filed on behalf of employees who feel that they have been wrongedLaws regarding employees are constantly changing at local, state, and federal levels, and it is essential for managers and personnel in human resources to stay up-to-date on these changes.

According to UnionTrack, workers at St. Charles Medical Center in central Oregon voted to unionize in 2019 and began the long process of bargaining their first contract. However, after hitting roadblocks and inequitable proposals from St. Charles management, the workers voted by 94% to strike. This began a historic nine-day strike, which brought in mass support across Oregon from political leaders, unions, faith, and community organizations. After months of stalling, this strike brought St. Charles back to the table with workable proposals, and the strike gave way to intensive bargaining sessions where a final agreement was reached. The medical techs, technologists, and therapists at St. Charles Medical Center have now ratified their first union contract.

Employees have several options to protect themselves and hold employers accountable when they violate labor laws. One option is to report unsafe working conditions to the government agency that regulates their workplaceEmployees can also file individual lawsuits against employers for employment law violations. Additionally, employees are protected by a variety of federal and state laws, including the National Labor Relations Act and statutes overseen by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which protect employees from hostile work environments, discrimination, and unfair labor practices. It is important for employees to be aware of their rights and to take action if they believe their employer has violated labor laws.

 

Related News

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-bridgeWASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Transportation, led by Secretary Pete Buttigieg, announced sweeping new regulations on Wednesday, requiring airlines to offer automatic cash refunds for significant delays and...

Stay up to date with all the latest news and information from the Machinists Union

The Battle for a First Contract: How Employers Use Unfair Labor Practices

April 26, 2023

Recent victories in organizing workers at companies such as Amazon, Starbucks, and Trader Joe’s indicate that it is possible for workers in industries previously thought to be impossible to unify. 

However, even when unions are formed, they often do not reach legally binding agreements with employers that would give workers more control over their pay, benefits, and protections. 

New research from the ILR School at Cornell University shows that when employers commit unfair labor practices to impede contract negotiations, the chances of winning a first contract within 18 months of voting to form a union decrease by about 71%. 

The study, titled “Breaking the deadlock: How union and employer tactics affect first contract achievement,” was published in the Industrial Relations Journal on February 25 and co-authored by ILR Ph.D. students Johnnie Kallas and Dongwoo Park and the University of Windsor Assistant Professor Rachel Aleks. According to Kallas, many people assume that winning a union election means being able to negotiate a contract readily. Still, in reality, less than half of unions have an agreement one year after an election. This is because nothing in U.S. labor law requires an employer to reach an agreement on a first contract within a given timeframe. Unethical employers can prolong labor talks for years.

According to the National Labor Relations Board, the National Labor Relations Act gives employees the right to bargain collectively with their employer through a representative they and their coworkers choose. The union and employer must bargain in good faith about wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment until they agree on a labor contract or reach a stand-off or “impasse.” However, an employer is not legally required to reach an agreement on a first contract within the timeframe union members ask for.

The National Labor Relation Board is the Federal agency that regulates unions outside the transportation sector. Railroads and Airlines are regulated by another agency called the National Mediation Board.

Employer opposition can have a negative impact on unions achieving a first contract, with many engaging in illegal tactics such as spreading rumors about job loss and plant closings. Employers also use other unethical means, such as captive audience meetings, to delay the process. In 39% of cases, employers retained the use of an anti-union consultant.

According to a recent article from Bloomberg Law, the time it takes to negotiate a first contract with a union has increased from an average of 409 days to now an average of 465 days – or well over one year. A typical airline contract takes an average of 4 years to fully negotiate.

However, it is important to note that this is an average, and the actual time it takes to negotiate a first contract can vary depending on various factors such as the industry or sector in which the negotiations are occurring.

Unfortunately, some employers may choose to ignore labor laws altogether. This can result in HR policy blunders and expensive lawsuits filed on behalf of employees who feel that they have been wrongedLaws regarding employees are constantly changing at local, state, and federal levels, and it is essential for managers and personnel in human resources to stay up-to-date on these changes.

According to UnionTrack, workers at St. Charles Medical Center in central Oregon voted to unionize in 2019 and began the long process of bargaining their first contract. However, after hitting roadblocks and inequitable proposals from St. Charles management, the workers voted by 94% to strike. This began a historic nine-day strike, which brought in mass support across Oregon from political leaders, unions, faith, and community organizations. After months of stalling, this strike brought St. Charles back to the table with workable proposals, and the strike gave way to intensive bargaining sessions where a final agreement was reached. The medical techs, technologists, and therapists at St. Charles Medical Center have now ratified their first union contract.

Employees have several options to protect themselves and hold employers accountable when they violate labor laws. One option is to report unsafe working conditions to the government agency that regulates their workplaceEmployees can also file individual lawsuits against employers for employment law violations. Additionally, employees are protected by a variety of federal and state laws, including the National Labor Relations Act and statutes overseen by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which protect employees from hostile work environments, discrimination, and unfair labor practices. It is important for employees to be aware of their rights and to take action if they believe their employer has violated labor laws.

 

Related

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-bridgeWASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Transportation, led by Secretary Pete Buttigieg, announced sweeping new regulations on Wednesday, requiring airlines to offer automatic cash refunds for significant delays and...

Disruptive Passenger Causes United Flight to Return to Newark

Disruptive Passenger Causes United Flight to Return to Newark

Disruptive Passenger Causes United Flight to Return to Newark

IAM141.org

A United flight bound for Israel was forced to turn around and return to Newark airport early Sunday morning due to a disruptive passenger. The flight, which had already been delayed by two hours, had only been in the air for three hours before the incident occurred.

According to Local News Outlets, the passenger sat in a seat reserved for flight attendants while waiting to use the bathroom. When asked to move by a crew member, the man refused and began arguing with flight attendants.

Upon arrival back in Newark, law enforcement escorted the man off the plane. United Airlines released a statement saying, “United Flight 90 traveling from Newark to Tel Aviv returned to Newark shortly after takeoff due to a disruptive passenger. Law enforcement met the aircraft and removed the passenger. A new flight was scheduled to depart Sunday evening.”

The flight, originally scheduled to depart at 10:55 p.m., left Newark at 12:48 a.m. and arrived at the airport at 6:28 a.m., according to FlightAware.com. Passengers were booked onto a new flight for late Sunday.

In response to the growing number of air rage incidents, unions, including the Machinists Union and other airline workers, have called on the government, airlines, and airports to take stronger measures to reduce the number of unruly passenger incidents. Some of their proposals include banning to-go alcohol sales at airports, sharing internal no-fly lists between airlines so that banned passengers cannot disrupt another flight, and increasing fines and other penalties for disruptive and abusive behavior

Additionally, U.S. Senate and House members have proposed a new no-fly list for unruly passengers that would allow the Transportation Security Administration to ban people convicted or fined for assaulting or interfering with airline crew members.

U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) and U.S. Representatives Eric Swalwell (D-CA) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) have introduced new bipartisan legislation that could stiffen penalties against offenders convicted of assaulting flight crew aboard an aircraft and place them on a commercial no-fly list. 

 The proposed legislation, called the Protection from Abusive Passengers Act, is aimed at protecting travelers and frontline aircrew members from physical abuse that has become more frequent during flightsThe lawmakers say the enhanced penalty will serve as a strong deterrent against combative passengers and is needed to improve the safety of frontline aviation crews, attendants, and passengers.

 

Related News

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-bridgeWASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Transportation, led by Secretary Pete Buttigieg, announced sweeping new regulations on Wednesday, requiring airlines to offer automatic cash refunds for significant delays and...

Stay up to date with all the latest news and information from the Machinists Union

Disruptive Passenger Causes United Flight to Return to Newark

April 26, 2023

A United flight bound for Israel was forced to turn around and return to Newark airport early Sunday morning due to a disruptive passenger. The flight, which had already been delayed by two hours, had only been in the air for three hours before the incident occurred.

According to Local News Outlets, the passenger sat in a seat reserved for flight attendants while waiting to use the bathroom. When asked to move by a crew member, the man refused and began arguing with flight attendants.

Upon arrival back in Newark, law enforcement escorted the man off the plane. United Airlines released a statement saying, “United Flight 90 traveling from Newark to Tel Aviv returned to Newark shortly after takeoff due to a disruptive passenger. Law enforcement met the aircraft and removed the passenger. A new flight was scheduled to depart Sunday evening.”

The flight, originally scheduled to depart at 10:55 p.m., left Newark at 12:48 a.m. and arrived at the airport at 6:28 a.m., according to FlightAware.com. Passengers were booked onto a new flight for late Sunday.

In response to the growing number of air rage incidents, unions, including the Machinists Union and other airline workers, have called on the government, airlines, and airports to take stronger measures to reduce the number of unruly passenger incidents. Some of their proposals include banning to-go alcohol sales at airports, sharing internal no-fly lists between airlines so that banned passengers cannot disrupt another flight, and increasing fines and other penalties for disruptive and abusive behavior

Additionally, U.S. Senate and House members have proposed a new no-fly list for unruly passengers that would allow the Transportation Security Administration to ban people convicted or fined for assaulting or interfering with airline crew members.

U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) and U.S. Representatives Eric Swalwell (D-CA) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) have introduced new bipartisan legislation that could stiffen penalties against offenders convicted of assaulting flight crew aboard an aircraft and place them on a commercial no-fly list. 

 The proposed legislation, called the Protection from Abusive Passengers Act, is aimed at protecting travelers and frontline aircrew members from physical abuse that has become more frequent during flightsThe lawmakers say the enhanced penalty will serve as a strong deterrent against combative passengers and is needed to improve the safety of frontline aviation crews, attendants, and passengers.

 

Related

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-bridgeWASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Transportation, led by Secretary Pete Buttigieg, announced sweeping new regulations on Wednesday, requiring airlines to offer automatic cash refunds for significant delays and...

Study: More Workers Demand Employers Pay at Least $76k

Study: More Workers Demand Employers Pay at Least $76k

Study: More Workers Demand Employers Pay

at Least $76k to Start New Job

IAM141.org

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has released the results of a survey that analyzed the experiences of individuals during their job search. The survey had a sample size of over 1,000 respondents and was conducted from October 2020 to March 2021. 

Over the last four months, the average full-time wage that people were offered has gone up to $62,088 from $59,834 in November 2022. However, people are less satisfied with the amount of money they’re getting paid, the non-wage benefits they receive, and their chances of being promoted at their current jobs. 

The average “reservation wage,” which is the lowest salary that people would accept for a new job, has reached a record high of $75,811. This increase is mainly because older people over the age of 45 and those who have attended college are asking for more money.

If people are expecting to get a job offer, the average expected yearly salary has decreased to $58,710 from $61,187 in November 2022. This means people are expecting less money than before. For those who are already employed, the chance of them finding a new employer in the next four months has increased to 12.5%, while the likelihood of them becoming unemployed has risen to 2.5%. Men and people who did not attend college are primarily responsible for the increase in unemployment expectations.

The results show that the time needed to find a job and perceived job availability varies significantly across different demographic groups and income levels.

Individuals with a high school degree or less are taking longer to find a new job than those with a college degree or higher. 

Individuals with a high school degree or less typically needed ten weeks to find a new job, compared to 6 weeks for those with a college degree or higher. Higher levels of education may lead to greater job opportunities and a quicker job search.

The survey also found that women reported longer job search durations than men, with a median duration of 8 weeks for women compared to 6 weeks for men. 

Additionally, job search duration was even longer for Black and Hispanic respondents compared to white respondents. Black and Hispanic job seekers had a median of 9 weeks and eight weeks, respectively, to find a job. By comparison, white respondents only needed 6 weeks.

Another interesting finding of the survey is that people with higher incomes tended to think there were more job openings than those who earned less. 

People with an annual household income of less than $50,000 were less likely to think there were good job opportunities available. Only 31% of these people reported that job availability was good or very good. In contrast, people who made $100,000 or more annually were more likely to think there were good job opportunities available. 59% of these people reported that job availability was good or very good. These findings suggest that income inequality may be a factor in how people view job availability.

The survey also asked respondents about their wage expectations when starting a new job. On average, respondents expected a wage of $20.80 per hour. However, wage expectations varied across different demographic groups and income levels. 

Women expected to be paid less than men, with an expected wage of $19.20 per hour compared to $22.30 per hour for men. 

Additionally, individuals with a high school degree or less expected a lower wage than those with a college degree or higher, with an expected wage of $16.80 per hour compared to $23.20 per hour for those with a college degree or higher. These findings suggest that certain demographic groups and education levels may face wage disparities when starting a new job.

The survey results highlight the importance of understanding the experiences of individuals during their job search. The findings suggest that certain demographic groups and income levels may face additional barriers to employment and may have different perceptions of job availability and wage expectations. This information can be used to inform policies that aim to address income inequality and reduce barriers to employment.

To address the longer job search durations experienced by individuals with a high school degree or less, policymakers may consider investing in education and training programs to provide these individuals with the skills needed to compete in the job market. Additionally, policies that aim to reduce discrimination based on gender and race may help to reduce the disparities in job search duration and wage expectations experienced by specific demographic groups.

Legislation could also include increasing the minimum wage or providing tax credits to low-income individuals to help them make ends meet.

Read the Report Here >>

 

Related News

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-bridgeWASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Transportation, led by Secretary Pete Buttigieg, announced sweeping new regulations on Wednesday, requiring airlines to offer automatic cash refunds for significant delays and...

Stay up to date with all the latest news and information from the Machinists Union

Study: More Workers Demand Employers Pay at Least $76k to Start New Job

April 20, 2023

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has released the results of a survey that analyzed the experiences of individuals during their job search. The survey had a sample size of over 1,000 respondents and was conducted from October 2020 to March 2021. 

Over the last four months, the average full-time wage that people were offered has gone up to $62,088 from $59,834 in November 2022. However, people are less satisfied with the amount of money they’re getting paid, the non-wage benefits they receive, and their chances of being promoted at their current jobs. 

The average “reservation wage,” which is the lowest salary that people would accept for a new job, has reached a record high of $75,811. This increase is mainly because older people over the age of 45 and those who have attended college are asking for more money.

If people are expecting to get a job offer, the average expected yearly salary has decreased to $58,710 from $61,187 in November 2022. This means people are expecting less money than before. For those who are already employed, the chance of them finding a new employer in the next four months has increased to 12.5%, while the likelihood of them becoming unemployed has risen to 2.5%. Men and people who did not attend college are primarily responsible for the increase in unemployment expectations.

The results show that the time needed to find a job and perceived job availability varies significantly across different demographic groups and income levels.

Individuals with a high school degree or less are taking longer to find a new job than those with a college degree or higher. 

Individuals with a high school degree or less typically needed ten weeks to find a new job, compared to 6 weeks for those with a college degree or higher. Higher levels of education may lead to greater job opportunities and a quicker job search.

The survey also found that women reported longer job search durations than men, with a median duration of 8 weeks for women compared to 6 weeks for men. 

Additionally, job search duration was even longer for Black and Hispanic respondents compared to white respondents. Black and Hispanic job seekers had a median of 9 weeks and eight weeks, respectively, to find a job. By comparison, white respondents only needed 6 weeks.

Another interesting finding of the survey is that people with higher incomes tended to think there were more job openings than those who earned less. 

People with an annual household income of less than $50,000 were less likely to think there were good job opportunities available. Only 31% of these people reported that job availability was good or very good. In contrast, people who made $100,000 or more annually were more likely to think there were good job opportunities available. 59% of these people reported that job availability was good or very good. These findings suggest that income inequality may be a factor in how people view job availability.

The survey also asked respondents about their wage expectations when starting a new job. On average, respondents expected a wage of $20.80 per hour. However, wage expectations varied across different demographic groups and income levels. 

Women expected to be paid less than men, with an expected wage of $19.20 per hour compared to $22.30 per hour for men. 

Additionally, individuals with a high school degree or less expected a lower wage than those with a college degree or higher, with an expected wage of $16.80 per hour compared to $23.20 per hour for those with a college degree or higher. These findings suggest that certain demographic groups and education levels may face wage disparities when starting a new job.

The survey results highlight the importance of understanding the experiences of individuals during their job search. The findings suggest that certain demographic groups and income levels may face additional barriers to employment and may have different perceptions of job availability and wage expectations. This information can be used to inform policies that aim to address income inequality and reduce barriers to employment.

To address the longer job search durations experienced by individuals with a high school degree or less, policymakers may consider investing in education and training programs to provide these individuals with the skills needed to compete in the job market. Additionally, policies that aim to reduce discrimination based on gender and race may help to reduce the disparities in job search duration and wage expectations experienced by specific demographic groups.

Legislation could also include increasing the minimum wage or providing tax credits to low-income individuals to help them make ends meet.

Read the Report Here >>

Related

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-bridgeWASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Transportation, led by Secretary Pete Buttigieg, announced sweeping new regulations on Wednesday, requiring airlines to offer automatic cash refunds for significant delays and...

New Bill Promises Living Wages and Benefits for Airport Workers

New Bill Promises Living Wages and Benefits for Airport Workers

New Bill Promises Living Wages and Benefits for Airport Workers

IAM141.org

Washington D.C.: A new proposed law called the “Good Jobs for Good Airports Act” aims to ensure airport service workers in the United States receive a living wage and important benefits like health care. The law would help create fair working conditions for airport employees and improve airport safety and security nationwide.

Representative Jesús García from Illinois introduced the law. It would apply to small, medium, and large airports that get money from the federal government or federally authorized fees. By focusing on airports that get federal support, the legislation seeks to ensure taxpayer money is used to promote fair labor practices and keep a well-trained aviation workforce.

Representative García said the legislation ensures that the people who help airports run smoothly are treated fairly and receive the benefits they need to support their families. He emphasized the important role that airport service workers have in keeping airports safe and functioning.

SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION;
Call the Committee at (202) 225-9446

The law would create a system to balance aviation-sector interests without causing major disruptions for the flying public. Airport sponsors would need to certify every year that they pay their service workers a wage and benefits that follow the law. This certification process would help ensure airports are transparent about their labor practices.

The Secretary of Transportation would be in charge of making sure everyone follows the new rules. This oversight would help maintain fairness among airports and ensure that the benefits of the legislation reach the workers it’s meant for.

“Just as airplanes don’t fly without pilots, our aviation system would collapse without airport service workers. Unfortunately, airport workers are often overworked and underpaid. This isn’t just bad for workers, it’s bad for travelers too,” stated Senator Ed Markey, a sponsor of the bill. 

Earlier this year, airport employees urged airlines to address the low-paying jobs at airports. However, with no response from airline CEOs, airport workers took their demands to their elected representatives.

LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS LEGISLATION >>

“I’m here humbly to ask all of Congress to pass this bill,” expressed Ababuti Oloki, a skycap at Boston Logan International Airport.

While some airport service workers have secured better wages and benefits in an increasing number of states, localities, and airport authorities, numerous major airports still lack any minimum standards beyond the minimum wage. An airport service worker in one city might earn $18/hour for the same job that a worker in another city receives as little as $8/hour.

“The safety of everyone in the planes depends on us, but we’re not respected for the work we do. We make low wages,” said Verna Montalvo, a cabin cleaner at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport.

The Good Jobs for Good Airports Act of 2022 intends to establish national wage and benefits standards for airport service workers at major airports receiving federal funds. Its goal is to stabilize air travel and ensure there is sufficient, well-trained staff to maintain a strong, safe, and secure aviation system.

The legislation has gained support from members of the CWA, Unite Here!, Association of Flight Attendants-CWA (AFA-CWA), the Transport Workers Union (TWU), the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM), and the National Conference of Firemen and Oilers (NCFO).

LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS LEGISLATION >>

The law would apply to airport grants and terminal programs under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Funding for airport infrastructure and terminals would depend on whether the airports follow the labor standards for service workers. This approach encourages airports to adopt fair labor practices to get the funding they need for improvements and expansions.

Labor unions support the proposed law because they’ve long pushed for better working conditions and wages for airport service workers. Some airport operators also support the legislation, as they see the benefits of having a stable, well-paid workforce for improving airport security and efficiency.

The “Good Jobs for Good Airports Act” has been sent to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure for more consideration. The committee will likely examine the bill’s details, potential impacts, and any needed changes before it goes to a vote.

If passed, the law would help airport service workers get the minimum wages and benefits they need to support their families and help keep the nation’s airports safe and secure. 

Read the Good Jobs for Good Airports Act >>

 

Related News

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-bridgeWASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Transportation, led by Secretary Pete Buttigieg, announced sweeping new regulations on Wednesday, requiring airlines to offer automatic cash refunds for significant delays and...

Stay up to date with all the latest news and information from the Machinists Union

New Bill Promises Living Wages and Benefits for Airport Workers

April 20, 2023

Washington D.C.: A new proposed law called the “Good Jobs for Good Airports Act” aims to ensure airport service workers in the United States receive a living wage and important benefits like health care. The law would help create fair working conditions for airport employees and improve airport safety and security nationwide.

Representative Jesús García from Illinois introduced the law. It would apply to small, medium, and large airports that get money from the federal government or federally authorized fees. By focusing on airports that get federal support, the legislation seeks to ensure taxpayer money is used to promote fair labor practices and keep a well-trained aviation workforce.

Representative García said the legislation ensures that the people who help airports run smoothly are treated fairly and receive the benefits they need to support their families. He emphasized the important role that airport service workers have in keeping airports safe and functioning.

SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION;
Call the Committee at (202) 225-9446

The law would create a system to balance aviation-sector interests without causing major disruptions for the flying public. Airport sponsors would need to certify every year that they pay their service workers a wage and benefits that follow the law. This certification process would help ensure airports are transparent about their labor practices.

The Secretary of Transportation would be in charge of making sure everyone follows the new rules. This oversight would help maintain fairness among airports and ensure that the benefits of the legislation reach the workers it’s meant for.

“Just as airplanes don’t fly without pilots, our aviation system would collapse without airport service workers. Unfortunately, airport workers are often overworked and underpaid. This isn’t just bad for workers, it’s bad for travelers too,” stated Senator Ed Markey, a sponsor of the bill. 

Earlier this year, airport employees urged airlines to address the low-paying jobs at airports. However, with no response from airline CEOs, airport workers took their demands to their elected representatives.

LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS LEGISLATION >>

“I’m here humbly to ask all of Congress to pass this bill,” expressed Ababuti Oloki, a skycap at Boston Logan International Airport.

While some airport service workers have secured better wages and benefits in an increasing number of states, localities, and airport authorities, numerous major airports still lack any minimum standards beyond the minimum wage. An airport service worker in one city might earn $18/hour for the same job that a worker in another city receives as little as $8/hour.

“The safety of everyone in the planes depends on us, but we’re not respected for the work we do. We make low wages,” said Verna Montalvo, a cabin cleaner at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport.

The Good Jobs for Good Airports Act of 2022 intends to establish national wage and benefits standards for airport service workers at major airports receiving federal funds. Its goal is to stabilize air travel and ensure there is sufficient, well-trained staff to maintain a strong, safe, and secure aviation system.

The legislation has gained support from members of the CWA, Unite Here!, Association of Flight Attendants-CWA (AFA-CWA), the Transport Workers Union (TWU), the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM), and the National Conference of Firemen and Oilers (NCFO).

The law would apply to airport grants and terminal programs under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Funding for airport infrastructure and terminals would depend on whether the airports follow the labor standards for service workers. This approach encourages airports to adopt fair labor practices to get the funding they need for improvements and expansions.

Labor unions support the proposed law because they’ve long pushed for better working conditions and wages for airport service workers. Some airport operators also support the legislation, as they see the benefits of having a stable, well-paid workforce for improving airport security and efficiency.

LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS LEGISLATION >>

The “Good Jobs for Good Airports Act” has been sent to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure for more consideration. The committee will likely examine the bill’s details, potential impacts, and any needed changes before it goes to a vote.

If passed, the law would help airport service workers get the minimum wages and benefits they need to support their families and help keep the nation’s airports safe and secure. 

Read the Good Jobs for Good Airports Act >>

Related

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-bridgeWASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Transportation, led by Secretary Pete Buttigieg, announced sweeping new regulations on Wednesday, requiring airlines to offer automatic cash refunds for significant delays and...

IAM and United Airlines Tentative Agreements Provide Immediate Benefits

IAM and United Airlines Tentative Agreements Provide Immediate Benefits

IAM and United Airlines Tentative Agreements Provide Immediate Benefits

IAM141.org

United Airlines and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) union have reached tentative agreements covering seven separate workgroups, including fleet service workers, passenger service workers, storekeepers, central load planners, maintenance instructors, fleet technical instructors, and security officers. 

These agreements are intended to provide workplace improvements for covered union members while more comprehensive agreements are negotiated. Union negotiators will begin preparing for new rounds of contract talks in the next few months.

The agreements will provide the highest overall compensation for every covered workgroup and extend outsourcing protections for 17 stations. The deals will extend “no furlough” rules for employees, based on seniority, by twenty years, to June 2019.

The tentative agreements will also include a Ratification bonus for the union, giving members $110 for each year with the company. If ratified, the union will see job protections and pay to improve immediately on the ratification date. The union will also get a $45 million Ratification bonus, which will begin going out in the first pay period after ratification.

“The new agreements will provide immediate job protections and pay increases for our members,” said Mike Klemm, the IAM Union’s District President who helped lead the negotiations. “The Ratification bonus will give our union a significant boost and recognize our members’ years of service to the company.”

The IAM union has been negotiating with United Airlines since 2019, but talks were put on hold due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Negotiations resumed in December 2022 and concluded earlier this month. 

Union Members in good standing will begin ratification votes on all the agreements on April 24 by electronic ballot. The voting period will last until May 1 at 6:00 pm, when all votes will be tallied. 

Local committees are holding informational town hall and break room meetings at airports nationwide, explaining how the agreements will impact each workgroup. A list of dates for the sessions has been published online.

If ratified, the agreements will position United Airlines to outcompete other airlines in a tight labor market by increasing lead pay by $3/hour and boosting wages in some cases to over $40/hour. They will also insource work at 17 airports nationwide and prevent outsourcing for more employees.

The IAM union’s announcement of the tentative agreements is a welcome development for United Airlines, which has faced uncertainty in recent years due to labor disputes and financial challenges. With these agreements, United Airlines is positioning itself to remain competitive in the airline industry and retain its workforce in a tight labor market.

The announcement also has implications for other airlines in the industry, particularly those that may be facing negotiations with the Machinists Union in the near future. If ratified, these agreements could set industry standards for compensation and job security, making it more difficult for other airlines to compete for workers in a tight labor market.

 

Related News

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-bridgeWASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Transportation, led by Secretary Pete Buttigieg, announced sweeping new regulations on Wednesday, requiring airlines to offer automatic cash refunds for significant delays and...

Stay up to date with all the latest news and information from the Machinists Union

IAM and United Airlines Tentative Agreements Provide Immediate Benefits

April 17, 2023

United Airlines and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) union have reached tentative agreements covering seven separate workgroups, including fleet service workers, passenger service workers, storekeepers, central load planners, maintenance instructors, fleet technical instructors, and security officers. 

These agreements are intended to provide workplace improvements for covered union members while more comprehensive agreements are negotiated. Union negotiators will begin preparing for new rounds of contract talks in the next few months.

The agreements will provide the highest overall compensation for every covered workgroup and extend outsourcing protections for 17 stations. The deals will extend “no furlough” rules for employees, based on seniority, by twenty years, to June 2019.

The tentative agreements will also include a Ratification bonus for the union, giving members $110 for each year with the company. If ratified, the union will see job protections and pay to improve immediately on the ratification date. The union will also get a $45 million Ratification bonus, which will begin going out in the first pay period after ratification.

“The new agreements will provide immediate job protections and pay increases for our members,” said Mike Klemm, the IAM Union’s District President who helped lead the negotiations. “The Ratification bonus will give our union a significant boost and recognize our members’ years of service to the company.”

The IAM union has been negotiating with United Airlines since 2019, but talks were put on hold due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Negotiations resumed in December 2022 and concluded earlier this month. 

Union Members in good standing will begin ratification votes on all the agreements on April 24 by electronic ballot. The voting period will last until May 1 at 6:00 pm, when all votes will be tallied. 

Local committees are holding informational town hall and break room meetings at airports nationwide, explaining how the agreements will impact each workgroup. A list of dates for the sessions has been published online.

If ratified, the agreements will position United Airlines to outcompete other airlines in a tight labor market by increasing lead pay by $3/hour and boosting wages in some cases to over $40/hour. They will also insource work at 17 airports nationwide and prevent outsourcing for more employees.

The IAM union’s announcement of the tentative agreements is a welcome development for United Airlines, which has faced uncertainty in recent years due to labor disputes and financial challenges. With these agreements, United Airlines is positioning itself to remain competitive in the airline industry and retain its workforce in a tight labor market.

The announcement also has implications for other airlines in the industry, particularly those that may be facing negotiations with the Machinists Union in the near future. If ratified, these agreements could set industry standards for compensation and job security, making it more difficult for other airlines to compete for workers in a tight labor market.

 

Related

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-Bridge

WATCH: Storms Blow American Plane from Jet-bridgeWASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Transportation, led by Secretary Pete Buttigieg, announced sweeping new regulations on Wednesday, requiring airlines to offer automatic cash refunds for significant delays and...

30,000 Machinists Union Members at United Reach Tentative Agreement

30,000 Machinists Union Members at United Reach Tentative Agreement

30,000 Machinists Union Members at United Reach Tentative Agreement

On March 29, we informed you that we reached an Agreement in Principle (AIP) with United Airlines on seven contracts covering over 29,000 IAM members at United Airlines. We’re happy to inform you that we have transitioned the AIP into a Tentative Agreement (TA) for you to review and vote on.

All changes to the current agreements can be viewed on our website, iam141.org. It is important to note that only changes will appear on the website. If it is not on the website, then the contractual language remains the same as it does today.

All IAM-United grievance committees attended an informational session yesterday, followed by questions and answers in ORD. IAM District Lodge 141 Officers will also visit each location to explain the tentative agreements and answer questions. Please check the website for what day they will be in your station.

Voting will be conducted electronically by BallotPoint Election Services. You will be sent voting instructions with a Personal Identification Number to the address you have on file with the company. The voting period will commence at 00:01 EDT on April 24, 2023, and last through 18:00 EDT on May 1, 2023.

Please call (888) 608-1411 with questions about voting instructions and electronic voting. Feel free to get in touch with your respective Assistant General Chairperson with questions about specific contract language.

In Solidarity,

Your Negotiating Committee
Olu Ajetomobi
Joe Bartz
Victor Hernandez
Barb Martin
Andrea’ Myers
Terry Stansbury
Faysal Silwany
Erik Stenberg
Sue Weisner

Michael G Klemm
President and Directing General Chair,
District 141,
International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers

Recording Secretaries: Please print and post on all IAMAW bulletin Boards.